Mail Archive Search: <+from:N6BUU@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:N6BUU@aol.com: 85 ]

Total 85 documents matching your query.

41. [AMPS] Talking SB-200 (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 15:09:54 EDT; << another one and no such problem. I think the material used in these is similar to that used in piezoelectric transducers. 73, Dan, N5AR >> IF I REMEMBER RIGHT IT'S A TITANIUM MATERIAL. HANK -- FAQ; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00303.html (7,466 bytes)
42. [AMPS] RF filament choke for indirectly heated cathodes? (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 16:50:49 EDT; << Ameritron does it right, but alas, no anode parasitic suppressor! (((73))) Phil, K5PC >> IT SEEMS TO ME THAT MAKES EVEN LESS SENCE! HANK -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissio; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00307.html (8,891 bytes)
43. [AMPS] RF filament choke for indirectly heated cathodes? (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 16:50:50 EDT; << Good point, Hank. My guess is that most of the manufacturers have engineers with limited educations. . For instance, all of the Ameritron/MFJ amps use a HV ''bypass'' cap that has 88-ohms of Xc at; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00308.html (9,670 bytes)
44. [AMPS] Tubes in Oil (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 18:00:50 EDT; << It has been banned in the UK >> THATS NOT THE ONLY THING THATS HAS BEEN BANNED OF LATE IN THE UK! HANK -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administra; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00311.html (7,105 bytes)
45. [AMPS] Tubes in Oil (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 18:00:48 EDT; << type transformers for industrial use. He said that they used to go "up to their armpits" with the PCB's. >> I ALSO HAD A FRIEND THAT SAID THE SAME THING. HE WORKED FOR GE AT A XFORMER PLANT......A; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00312.html (6,974 bytes)
46. [AMPS] RF filament choke for indirectly heated cathodes? (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 20:58:30 EDT; << yes i know, it just makes it easier to read the screen without using my glasses! sorry... regards hank -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administra; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00321.html (9,869 bytes)
47. [AMPS] " Kein Rauch ohne Feuer ...." (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 13:10:42 EDT; << No, unfortunately, the AL-1500 does cover 160 meters; unlike the SB-220. There is ony one 1000pf bypass cap. at the base of the plate choke.There is only one plate choke, with several windings spa; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00350.html (8,774 bytes)
48. [AMPS] " Kein Rauch ohne Feuer ...." (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 15:03:50 EDT; << As long as the hv ps filter capacitors make it through the one-year warranty period, all is well. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end ok rich i guess i asked for that one! i just; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00353.html (8,764 bytes)
49. [AMPS] Here are the results . . . (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:47:44 EDT; diluted CASTROL super clean works well on oily cigarette tars, but watch it on painted surfaces hank -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00482.html (6,721 bytes)
50. SV: SV: [AMPS]+ (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:47:40 EDT; << If the fathers did not sin there would be no children Hans SM5KI -- >> then it makes u wonder what happened 2000 years ago! hank -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00483.html (6,437 bytes)
51. [AMPS] Power Handling Capability of Coax Cable (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 17:03:22 EDT; years ago i made a note of the rg-58u ratings from the AMPHENOL CATALOG cw x4 for ssb. the rating for 75 mtrs was 2.6 kw which would be a round 7 amps.?? the 20 mtr. rating was .8 kw continous. the c; /archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00071.html (8,427 bytes)
52. [AMPS] 4-1000 is this a good tube?+ (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 12:40:46 EDT; << Rich suggested 7.5 KV. Personally I think that's a little to high since the maximum rating is 7 KV if memory serves me. Of course if all you are going to do is run SSB, 7.5 KV is probably OK. But; /archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00218.html (8,008 bytes)
53. [AMPS] 4-1000 is this a good tube?+ (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 18:13:21 EDT; << pole and a Hook just before he got on the air. . // The 4-1000A is rated at 5000v with 100% plate modulation. That is 10kv peak. // I would choose a tube that has more emission. Cheers, Hank >> WE; /archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00226.html (7,603 bytes)
54. [AMPS] [amps]Emtron fan problem (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 13:21:24 EDT; << mit). My qth is 7000 ft above sea level. The stock fan is about 103CFM. I added another fan piggyback to the original one but the noise is unbearable. Has anyone had a similar experience with this; /archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00251.html (7,510 bytes)
55. [AMPS] air flow? (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 13:10:48 EDT; since we have touched on air flow for tube cooling, i have a question. my old 2 tube alpha (76A) has a blower specified in the manual as a "Howard" i assume this same blower is used in the 3 tube ver; /archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00257.html (6,910 bytes)
56. [AMPS] Emtron DX1 (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 11:47:11 EDT; << Rich has highlighted the fact that you will have a lot of back pressure. The idea of a remote big blower is probably the best for quietness but it will need to be big to get over the losses in the; /archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00304.html (8,299 bytes)
57. [AMPS] Re: SB-200 very strange behavior (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 17:10:04 EDT; << Just put it down to the inate perversity of inanimate objects. DO U MEAN MURPHY?? HANK -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative request; /archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00320.html (7,022 bytes)
58. [AMPS] conductive epoxy or similar (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 14:18:56 EDT; << I have one an Epoxy that functions well on the insulator side, now a conductive application is required. thank you skipp >> SKIP: ARE U TALKING ABOUT A THERMALLY CONDUCTIVE EPOXY?? IF SO INTERNATI; /archives//html/Amps/2000-04/msg00028.html (7,093 bytes)
59. [AMPS] L4B parasitic reistors (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 13:22:34 EDT; << is there any chance that this amp was in use at "area 51" in the past...just a thought! hank -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative r; /archives//html/Amps/2000-04/msg00094.html (7,945 bytes)
60. [AMPS] L4B parasitic reistors (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 13:51:04 EDT; << Drake has them for 3.00 each so I'll get a few of those to keep are u sure that ur not getting a "TV TYPE" DOORKNOB cap for that $3.00?? hank -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html; /archives//html/Amps/2000-04/msg00096.html (7,796 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]