Mail Archive Search: <+from:Jan.E.Holm@telia.se>

Results:

References: [ +from:Jan.E.Holm@telia.se: 65 ]

Total 65 documents matching your query.

21. [AMPS] Re: Surge voltage, HV connectors. (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 10:48:31 +0100; Was this really invented by the Britts? Maybe so, never heard of it before. Anyway, it´s the same in Sweden except every house gets a 3-phase 400V put in, which is nice, I have never ever durin; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00216.html (11,788 bytes)
22. [AMPS] Re: Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 12:33:32 +0100; Good somebofy did bring this up. At first I couldn´t beleive what was going on and had to call a coupple of friends to check if they did see the same, it was abslutley dreadful. I tried to tell; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00225.html (8,737 bytes)
23. [AMPS] Re: Re: Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 08:29:37 +0100; Yes I agree Tom. But in spite of the known exciter problems it is possible to run the radios so they sound pritty good and have quite decent bandwith. When I first got the FT1000D I started to run it; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00335.html (12,343 bytes)
24. [AMPS] Re: SSB interference (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:03:22 +0100; Indeed, that´s what I ask myself too. I don´t like or want to beleive that but maybe that´s the case after all. de SM2EKM -- --Ursprungligt meddelande-- Från: mike@g0mjw.frees; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00336.html (7,867 bytes)
25. [AMPS] Re: Re: Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 10:17:17 +0100; Well, sorry I have to dissagree. At least on 10/15/20 he had quite excessive bandwith and quite high distortion. Can tell about 40 since I never did get on 40 except to work FO0AAA. de Jim SM2EKM PS:; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00345.html (8,990 bytes)
26. [AMPS] Re: Re: Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 13:22:22 +0100; I used a FT1000D, don´t know what IP it has and in this case I wouldn´t say it´s important since there also was lot´s of stations on the band both being stronger and having a; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00355.html (12,566 bytes)
27. [AMPS] Re: Re: Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 13:28:06 +0100; Not important in this case since NB was OFF. de SM2EKM PS: Think we are loosing track a bit, need to get back up on the road again. -- --Ursprungligt meddelande-- Från: itr@nanoteq.co.za [SMTP:; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00356.html (10,077 bytes)
28. [AMPS] Re: Re: Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 18:18:34 +0100; Yes I´ve don that mod Tom to my radio, sure made wounders to the box. de Jim SM2EKM -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative request; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00389.html (9,358 bytes)
29. [AMPS] RE: Re: Re: Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 07:21:04 +0100; Wait a sec. You say below that signals was clean but distorted due to too much speech processing. How can a signal be clean and distorted at the same time? Please explain. 73, Jim SM2EKM -- --Ursprun; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00429.html (8,681 bytes)
30. [AMPS] RE: RE: Re: Re: Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 10:30:38 +0100; This is nothing but technocratic elbow bending, don´t want any part in it so I just bail out and continue to observ what happens in "real " life. Finaly, according to my standards a clean signa; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00448.html (8,372 bytes)
31. [AMPS] RE: Re: Re: Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 14:58:18 +0100; Absolutley Yes indeed, never stated anything different. Also true, again never stated anything different. Still I insist, I would never ever call a distorted signal clean, sorry guys! You tend to dr; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00462.html (8,721 bytes)
32. [AMPS] RE: RE: Re: Re: Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 15:15:53 +0100; Reason could be that English isn´t my native language, in any case it´s no big deal. How about this, if a car is dirty can it be called clean? Ooohh well, guess this is kind a´ far; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00465.html (7,942 bytes)
33. [AMPS] Re: New G2DAF amplifier information (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 07:31:36 +0100; Why the heck not? People I know runing G2DAF amps do sound much better and also have less bandwith then big time prominent hall of fame contesters using Alpha/Ameritron amps and latest so called stat; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00687.html (12,109 bytes)
34. [AMPS] Finaly found it! (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 15:19:48 +0100; Check out: users.ntplx.net/~dxerdave/photos.html How about a Wolf Box and why not a Ghost Rider!!! 73, Jim SM2EKM -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.co; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00702.html (6,677 bytes)
35. [AMPS] Re: Re: New G2DAF amplifier information (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 12:16:30 +0100; Sorry, I don´t follow you Mauri. Beats me what´s peculiar about a QBL5/3500. For size it´s smaller then a 4-1000A and not much bigger then a 3-500Z, just a little taller. Do we have; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00732.html (10,026 bytes)
36. [AMPS] lots of tube data here (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 12:19:56 +0100; For lots of tube data go to: www.mif.pg.gda.pl/homepages/frank/ QBL5/3500 and lot´s of other stuff 73 Jim SM2EKM -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesti; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00733.html (7,118 bytes)
37. [AMPS] Re: Re: New G2DAF amplifier information (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 13:11:54 +0100; Now, this below might be very important. Maybe this is the key to success. The DAF´s that I consider ok, sounds good and have normal SSB bandwith, all use QBL tube (or tubes). I have also heard; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00735.html (11,227 bytes)
38. [AMPS] Re: Re: New G2DAF amplifier information (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 07:29:53 +0100; Well, let´s stick to the QBL5/3500 or let´s try to find another tube that might work in DAF configuration. In my book I consider the QBL quite ok in DAF as I stated before, based upon sev; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00827.html (12,937 bytes)
39. [AMPS] Re: Re: New G2DAF amplifier information (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 07:49:11 +0100; Guys, Can´t we just let Norm and W6CHR rest in peace. What they did is not relevant nor interesting any more. What they did obviously didn´t work so just leave it alone. Now in this moder; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00887.html (10,005 bytes)
40. [AMPS] Re: G2DAF - Hearing is Believing (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 07:33:50 +0200; This has been my point the whole time! Nice that someone else also can understand. What I probably been after the whole time is why G2DAF seems to work just fine with G2DAF and it there are other tub; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00974.html (10,249 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]