On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 10:25:01AM -0800, K6VVA wrote:
> SS Packet DANGER, DANGER, Will Robinson!!!
>
> With the SS Phone weekend rapidly approaching, I sincerely hope this helps
> someone else to NOT make the same mistake (out of ignorance and
> misunderstanding) that I did in the 2006 SS CW event.
>
> Special TNX to wise sage Mr. Wardster, N0AX, for his advice as to a
> solution in this matter vs. simply requesting withdrawal of my humble,
> non-competitive log submission.
>
> 73 & Good Luck in the Contest, Om's...
>
> Rick, K6VVA
>
> P.S. I am strongly considering the NON-use of Packet during my limited QRV
> in the SS Phone event, so any pre-fill data with a "U" category *may* be
> incorrect ;-(
>
> RE:
> ===
>
> >Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:10:20 -0800
> >To: kc1j@arrl.org
> >From: K6VVA <dx35@hilding.com>
> >Subject: RE: K6VVA ARRL 2006 SS CW Log Submission
> >
> >Hello, Tom:
> >
> >In an abundance of caution, and due to my ignorance and misinterpretation
> >of packet rules for the "U" category, based upon several Reflector
> >discussions, it appears I need to change my K6VVA 2006 SS CW Log
> >Submission from the category of "U" to "M".
> >
> >In my operational excitement of only needing the "NL" section for a Clean
> >Sweep before having to QRT Sunday Morning, I recall making a post (like
> >others I'd seen) which I didn't even remotely consider to be
> >"solicitation" at the time.
Do the rules allow you to make a solicitation via packet
in the Multi category? I would think they would not allow
this in any category - if they do that is what needs to be changed.
--
George Fremin III - K5TR
geoiii@kkn.net
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|