WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

[WriteLog] Log serial numbers and score differences, problems with dupes

To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: [WriteLog] Log serial numbers and score differences, problems with dupes, etc.
From: n4sl@yahoo.com (Steve L.)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:44:02 -0800 (PST)
Hi Charlie,

When running SO2R, I found if I were running strings
on Radio R and then sent my call on Radio L, a QSO
number was assigned to the radio L's QSO box (where
you type in the received information). This QSO number
is then reserved for Radio L and Radio R gets the next
number.

If you either don't work the guy on Radio L and give
up OR the difference between radio R and L's serial
numbers gets too high (about 3-4) then Writelog will
'retire' Radio L's QSO number - it doesn't get used,
and Radio L's QSO number will start to update (if you
leave a callsign in the call field of Radio L's entry
box).

This happened to me in CW SS and it was confusing as
hell at first... but there is no harm done, the QSO #
isn't sent, just retired. When you make your final
file, it throws those out. I ended up with final
Seriall Number of 1130 but only 1109 QSOs, just a few
of those were dupes.

Look for 'missing' serial numbers in your final output
file, you'll find 'em.

73, Steve N4SL
--- Charles Morrison <cfmorris@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> I realize there are instances where the serial
> numbers and actual total
> qso's may be different following a contest, such as
> logged dupes etc.  But
> following SS this weekend, I've for some reason got
> a great discrepancy.  My
> ending qso serial numbers were 1805, however, Im
> only scoring 1785.  I've
> got several dupes still in the log and plan to
> remove them, however what
> else should I be looking for, or what stands out for
> other qso's not logged?
> 
> I want to do something with these dupes, should I
> delete the duped qso, or
> mark it unclaimed, or has this already been done? 
> The dupes still do not
> quantify enough to count towards the missing 20
> qsos.   I also had plenty of
> previous qso's marked B because the manual entry for
> the second radio band
> was incorrect.  I went back, edited the frequency
> and sideband entry to
> correct, did a recalculation and now these qso's
> don't show with a B, but
> did I fail to mark them as counted?  Could this be
> where Im losing these 20
> or so qsos?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Charlie
> KI5XP
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>