I haven't tried it, but probably won't for the same reason. The
APRS-VHF proponents might discuss the possibility of finding a
frequency up near the top of the band, maybe 147.57 .. I have a
144-146 bandpass filter ...
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 10:33 AM, David Erickson <erickson+vhf@mentis.org> wrote:
> We don't use APRS in the rover. When we are in motion one of us is trying
> to work people and it causes interference on 2m ssb.
>
>
> 73's
> Dave W3DIO
> http://www.w3dio.org
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>> Curious as to how many June contest rovers are planning on using APRS
>> and/or how many Multi-ops are planning on using rover APRS data ? If
>> you are using APRS, why ? If you are not using APRS, why not ?
>>
>> 73, Jon
>> W0ZQ
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|