I would go with 144 and 432. 144 has always been the "meat and potatoes"
band for me, with 432 a close second. I don't make too many random QSO's
on 222 and in some contests 50 MHz is completely dead and my portable beam
isn't large enough to overcome that.
Good luck!
73, Zack W9SZ
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Paul N1BUG wrote:
>
> I'm contemplating the future band line up here. I could drastically
> downsize all the antennas in order to get 4 bands operational again.
> Having operated with small antennas before, I know large ones are
> preferred this far from the activity centers. Or I could juggle the
> bands around. I'm curious... given ANY TWO bands out of
> 50-144-222-432, which two would you most like to see regularly
> active in contests from this grid? 222-432 would mean no liason on
> lower bands...
>
> Good luck to all!
>
> 73,
> Paul N1BUG FN55mf
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|