VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] JT65 vs. FSK441

To: u1004467@warwick.net, vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] JT65 vs. FSK441
From: Rhinosix <rhinosix@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:39:24 -0500 (EST)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Around here FN21 its JT65a at 50.276 and JT9 at 50.278. For 2 meters (144.176) to 70 cm its JT65b as in the Multipsk program. At 1296 maybe JT65c but I don't
operate there.
Jerry, W2JCN

-----Original Message-----
From: John Santillo <u1004467@warwick.net>
To: vhfcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Sent: Tue, Feb 18, 2014 8:29 pm
Subject: [VHFcontesting] JT65 vs. FSK441

Hello all,



I understand that FSK441 is primarily used for meteor scatter and JT65 is
for Tropo and HF too.  But for VHF contesting especially on 2M and above
isn't JT65 the preferred mode for weak signal work?



I would think the ionization from small grained sized meteors don't produce enough ionization for 2M and above to reflect off the trail. I would think JT65 would be better for 2M tropo and above but I'm looking for opinions.





73,



John

N2HMM



_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting



_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>