VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Whats up with the ARRL?

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com, frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Whats up with the ARRL?
From: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
The Programs and Services Committee has a lot of stuff on their plate. Most of 
it's members are not knowledgible about the VHF weak signal world, but they 
want to help. Hence, they created the VUAC, whose members have their own 
individual biases and specific lack of knowledge and/or experience. 
Recommendations from the VUAC are certain to be weighted by their own biases. 
Beyond that, I think that there is an ongoing "need to have contests run like 
on HF" mentality and pressure being pushed on ARRL officials by those who 
should have no say, such as contest log scoring volunteers, as an example. 
Officials in the ARRL rely on these volunteers to take care of a lot of work 
that needs to be done and must be grant them listening time. There is also a 
large lobby from many old corp EMEers who have influence by virtue of past 
contributions to amateur radio and the League.

So, it's not just a matter of the League officials not doing their job. It's 
more complicated than that. People on the PSC have indicated that they will be 
open to input regarding this "no assisted" rule. The doors haven't been locked 
on this.

Something might be said for pushing for change, but this kind of activism is 
unwarranted. Pushing to have people boycott contests is not called for.  

73,
Paul, K7CW

--- On Sun, 8/9/09, frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com> wrote:

From: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Whats up with the ARRL?
To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Date: Sunday, August 9, 2009, 9:04 AM


Though I generally try to encourage vhf activity, it seems that it may be a 
time to make a statement to the ARRL.  Marshall suggested sending in empty logs 
in response to the EME rule change.  I am not versed well in EME but I think he 
has a point. Un assisted may be the ultimate goal, and it is definitely more of 
a challenge, but the assisted should be there to help those to the ultimate 
goal if they can ever reach it.  
Compare it to golf, most of us will never be pros, but we still enjoy the game 
as an amateur or with a handicap.  It seems that the ARRL has wiped out the 
amateur and the Handicaps in this arena.
This strikes me as odd considering how they have reached out to encourage 
growth in other VHF contests such as the rover category.  Its my opinion that 
they botched  up  roving as well and tried to fix it with a band aid when it 
needed a major overhaul.  That being said, at least the effort was there to 
encourage participation even if  the PSC chose to ignore some of  the 
suggestions of the VUAC.
In comparison to that debacle, it seems that the ARRL went the other way with 
the EME contests.  This shows a total lack of direction from the ARRL. It also 
demonstrates that they are no better then a boat with no sail or engine and 
they will simply go where the winds and currents  of politics go.  
This leads me to believe that the ARRL contests are fundamentally flawed and 
lack any serious sense of purpose or vision.  I believe  in some cases like 
grid circling on microwave bands  they are only manufactured short range QSOs  
to justify the monopolization of otherwise unused spectrum and this is why the 
ARRl allows it to continue.  
Its time we took a honest  look at ourselves as amateur radio operators. We 
have a long history of giving to the human race in various ways.  But we get 
down right mad if they threaten to take away some spectrum way up in the 
microwaves that we will never use more than a few MHZ of.  If that technology 
can be put to better use then we should give it up.
Or better yet, maybe its time to find a better way to use that spectrum 
ourselves and seek to redefine our licenses as to help more people.  We have 
let the confines of our licenses let technology pass us by and we are becoming 
irrelevant unless a natural disaster hits.  
I challenge the ARRL to do something useful and to lobby for a redefinition of 
our privileges on the microwave bands.  One idea ; Let Amateurs set up moderate 
powered wireless network nodes in our spectrum above 2.4 ghz  and let non hams 
buy equipment to connect to them.  Imagine a more free internet using ham 
technology.  There has to be better ideas than this.  If we are to continue we 
must make ourselves relevant.
All of this shows that I think the ARRL is lost. The contest system is 
seriously flawed. It can never be perfect but the way they run it is half 
hearted and subject to too much politics and lacks any vision or sense of 
direction.  The things that some of us do to get the little pieces of paper are 
sometimes ludicrous and the fact that there is no real tangible standard makes 
them somewhat meaning less.
If there was a way to recall the PSC I would do it.  For now I agree with 
Marshall, if you are alienated due to the lack common sense in the rules just 
send in an empty log.  Do the contest and work towards your VUCC. At least 
there is a sense of direction with that award and a definite standard and the 
politics behind it are laid to rest. 
 
k3uhf
_________________________________________________________________
Get free photo software from Windows Live
http://www.windowslive.com/online/photos?ocid=PID23393::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_PH_software:082009
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting



      
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>