| To: | "\(Radio\) VHF Contesting" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [VHFcontesting] Explaining "the two simple rules" [was: Explaining "the three simple rules"] |
| From: | Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com> |
| Reply-to: | w2ev@yahoo.com |
| Date: | Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:47:23 -0800 (PST) |
| List-post: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
--- On Sun, 2/22/09, Mike (KA5CVH) Urich <ka5cvh@gmail.com wrote:
> >Again...no other class of operation can do this.
> >Neither should Rovers be able to.
>
> Mike asks
> And why not ... I think the rules are quite simple the way
> they are.
Hey...you know what?! I went looking and I stand corrected! The *only* class
of participant that can't change their location within the same Grid-4 during a
contest is the QRP Portable class (WHY PICK ON THEM?!?!). See: ARRL VHF rule
2.2.5.Single Operator Portable stations may not change locations during the
contest period outside of the original 500-meter diameter permitted circle.
I can't find any similar ARRL rule for any other class!
So...unless I've overlooked something, I rescind rule #3 leaving only "two
simple rules" to normalize rover scoring.
Ev, W2EV
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Explaining "the three simple rules" [was: Endorse Rover Rules Revisions EXCEPT the 30 Q Limit, Mike (KA5CVH) Urich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Explaining "the two simple rules" [was: Explaining "the three simple rules"], Zack Widup |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Explaining "the three simple rules" [was: Endorse Rover Rules Revisions EXCEPT the 30 Q Limit, Mike (KA5CVH) Urich |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Explaining "the two simple rules" [was: Explaining "the three simple rules"], Zack Widup |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |