VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting Philosophy

To: VHF Contesting eMail Remailer <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting Philosophy
From: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: w2ev@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:54:52 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Society is full of ambiguity and inaccuracy.  While this is difficult for 
engineers and programmers to truly understand, it is at the very core of the 
human condition.

That doesn't make something "broken" or "dysfunctional".  It simply makes it 
human.  Its' discussion likewise fills a human need to collaboratively attempt 
to resolve the apparent inconsistencies.

Ultimately...the sponsors of a contest will decide what "rules" they think are 
important (e.g. - the single op's 500 meter circle may not move within a 
grid...even though there is no prohibition to that in the stated rules) and 
what is not (e.g. - rovers may circle to their heart's content and be publicly 
celebrated for doing so, even though such actions fail to meet the stated 
objectives of the event).

I, for one, am thankful to the ARRL for their defense of my hobby and their 
sponsorship of events that bring me joy.  My hope is that those in Newington 
realize that when someone states a dissenting opinion, it is not usually 
indicative of opposition; rather, it is usually an indication of an attempt to 
help affect a more positive outcome.

Onward.
Ev, W2EV



      
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>