222 new to me since this spring. I will be on during the sprint from
FN10pd with a M2-5wl and 130w. Hope to make some contacts
Dave NZ3M
On 9/25/2010 1:52 PM, John Santillo wrote:
> Personally 222MHz is way under rated and under utilized.
>
>
>
> 222 is only 3.75dB worse in Free Space Pathloss than 2M. In addition the
> background noise floor is much higher on 2M than 222 so all things
> considered equal (antenna gain, power, system noise etc.), these bands are
> very similar.
>
>
>
> During this past September VHF Contest the only reason why we had more
> contacts on 2M than 222 was due to popularity, not propagation.
>
>
>
>
>
> 73,
>
>
>
> John
>
> N2HMM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|