To: | vhfcontesting@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover behavior: How about trying to address"it" withOUT having to define "it"? |
From: | Dan_K9ZF <n9rla@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:59:57 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
> #1. - QSOs with Rovers only worth ONE point each (regardless of band). > > > Yuck. This would be the death of Roving, and likely VHF contesting with it. > #2. - MY interpretation of what was in one of Frank, K3UHF's > postings..."Another solution is to only count the grid when working a > repeated rover and not the points. This forces other contacts." > I don't like this one either. I've never grid circled, why give me a penalty? 73 Dan -- K9ZF /R no budget Rover ***QRP-l #1269 Check out the Rover Resource Page at: <http://www.qsl.net/n9rla> List Administrator for: InHam+grid-loc+ham-books Ask me how to join the Indiana Ham Mailing list! _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover behavior: How about trying to address"it" withOUT having to define "it"?, Ev Tupis |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [VHFcontesting] Changing "it" - The framework for a new contest, Ev Tupis |
Previous by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] Rover behavior: How about trying to address "it"withOUT having to define "it"?, John (JK) Kalenowsky, K9JK |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Captive Roving...whatever that is, really, Ev Tupis |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |