VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] One "Idiot's" Reply - The Real WTX Story

To: VHF Contesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] One "Idiot's" Reply - The Real WTX Story
From: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:46:19 -0400
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
John Geiger wrote:
2.3.5.All Rovers are encouraged to adopt
operating practices that
allow as many stations as possible to contact
them.

So wouldn't this mean that they must stay up all
night, operating the entire contest?

Maybe. ;) That could be why the rules limit rovers to 2 operators but places no limit on the number of drivers. <giggle>


If you are in WTX, where there is little activity,
especially on the microwaves, grid circling is
adopting a practice that allows as many stations as
possible to contact you-when the other option is no
station contacts you on those bands.

And yet, others have said that they were in range, but this pack didn't seem to make it into their logs.


Even so...I'm arguing a point that I don't really have an interest in.

Instead... The underlying problem is that all other classes of participant start out the contest with no points in the log. A 5-rover "pack" with 11 bands travelling through 12 grids (3 opportunities to "dance" at a 4-grid intersection) starts the contest with somewhere around 885k points.

Their score will go down only if some equipment malfunctions (a car breaks down or a radio doesn't work), but will go up from there based on how many other (non-pack) stations they work. No other class of participant enjoys this scoring cushion.

The scoring-field is not level and certainly not proportional to Amateur operator or technical skill advancement. That is the crux of the issue.

Ev, W2EV


_______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>