Since I am primarily operating as a QRP Portable in VHF contests, I
need all the help I can get in the antenna department. It would be
nice to have a multi-band antenna that performs as well as a
single-band antenna, but does such a beast exist?
I am using a 6-element long-spaced Yagi on 2m (12 foot boom), similar
design on 222 with 8 elements (also a 12 foot boom) and a 12 element
on 432 (10 foot boom). The 432 antenna seems to perform the best so I
don't plan on changing it just yet. 144 seems to be my weakest band,
so I want to build an antenna with a longer boom (maybe 18 feet) for
this year's contests. Maybe I'll go to something longer on 222 also.
73, Zack W9SZ
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Tom Carney <tomc@carneysugai.com> wrote:
> Earlier I had done some modeling of a 2M/432 single feedline antenna
> using the open sleeve technique. These had not proven useful so I had
> abandon the approach. Now, prodded by KK6MC's post, I tried again.
>
> This time I started with 4 element 2M OWA beam instead of a conventional
> design. Right off, it looked promising. The 2M OWA beam modeled at 8.8
> dbi (free space), flat SWR, on a 33 inch boom. Just by adding a 432
> open sleeve "driver", I obtained over 7dbi with and SWR below .125 to 1
> on 432.
>
> I then started adding 432 elements. With a 432 reflector and a single
> director, I obtained got up to over 9dbi with a slightly better SWR.
>
> Unfortunately, ever thing I tried to add more 432 elements, degraded the
> performance.
>
> Still, it's a simple antenna. with four 2M elements, 3 three 432
> elements on a 33 inch boom I obtained almost 9dbi on both bands. The
> pattern on 432 is more like a mushroom than what you would expect from a
> conventional yagi. A very broad front lobe with only 8db front to back.
> Not a world beater but looks promising for a Joe706 antenna.
>
> It's fairly critical on the spacing of the 432 driver but even a tenth
> of an inch mistake doesn't degrade things a lot.
>
> You should have a choke balun however. Not sure the simple coin of coax
> will work at 432. Might be a problem.
>
> I'll keep experimenting.
>
> 73,
>
> Tom K6EU
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|