On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:41:14PM -0500, Marshall Williams wrote:
> FULL DISCLOSURE: When I returned to serious VHF activity, I hated what
> WSJT had done to "real" CW EME....the EME that I had enjoyed in the
> 70's. I know that even though CW EME was basically destroyed by JT, the
> old was replaced by a ton of new activity by stations all over the
> globe. I believe that "Activity is King"...anything that promotes
> activity is good, anything that discourages activity is bad. It is
> clear the WSJT has been VERY good for activity. I have eaten my crow on
> this issue.
>
First I will say for the most part I have not been following this issue.
I have however been wondering one thing.
Is there something about JT65 that requires that you have assistance
to make contacts? Something that is diffrent than what you would do on
CW?
Or is it that the realtime sechdules and assistance combinded with
JT65 just make the contact process so much eaiser that it has
stimulated activity?
As I said I have only seen one or two messages about this so maybe
this was covered before. I however would like to understand this
point.
I have never made a JT65 QSO - it has been on my list of things
to do but I have not done it yet.
I have made 6 CW EME contacts, all random, all with a single
non-elevating yagi. Five of those were on one moonrise. Maybe I was
just luckly but it was not that hard - it had the same feeling as
working weak long path dx on 160 or 80 meters.
--
George Fremin III - K5TR
geoiii@kkn.net
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|