Re: [VHFcontesting] Passing QSOs and WSJT-X Improved

[Ev Tupis via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>]

 Or APRS to keep it "all amateur radio"...especially for stations who operate 
from Internet deserts like Rovers.

    On Tuesday, January 14, 2025 at 09:18:26 PM EST, Fred Stefanik 
<n1dpmfred@gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 Like ON4KST
73
K1FMS

On Tue, Jan 14, 2025, 9:05 PM <alex@kr1st.com> wrote:

> I think QSY requests should be implemented with an off the air protocol
> using a cloud hosted QSY server and a QSY request client window or panel in
> the software. It's silly to transmit all this stuff on a crowded 3 kHz
> segment and a waste of time slots that could be used to make QSO's. It's
> not like everyone is on a separate frequency like on the analog modes where
> you can much more easily negotiate this stuff without wasting a shared
> resource with non-QSO traffic.
>
> Keep the airwaves for QSO's and use modern methods for the QSY requests,
> just any other form of assistance folks use these days to scare up a QSO.
>
> 73,
> --Alex KR1ST
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
  
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting