To: | "Terry Conboy" <n6ry@arrl.net>, "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@pclink.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole resonates lower than expected. |
From: | "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net> |
Reply-to: | kb0fhp@comcast.net |
Date: | Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:07:55 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Terry N6RY wrote: "And test equipment never lies. 8-)" This presumes proper calibration and operation..... For instance, a clock that loses one second a day will only be right once every 236.7 years, but one that is broken is right twice a day..... _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Need Roller Inductors, Byron Tatum |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete Fiber, Doug Rehman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole resonates lower than expected., Terry Conboy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole resonates lower than expected., Robert Chudek |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |