Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] FCP vs On ground.txt

To: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] FCP vs On ground.txt
From: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:43:06 -0600
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I have been following this thread closely because I am planning a 4 square
and thinking of the single, elevated radial from each vertical. For 160m I
was thinking of a quarter wave radial from the bottom of each vertical at
about 25’ sloping down to about 10’ at the end. But I guess that should be
in a new thread.

Chuck W5PR

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 1:48 PM Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:

> On 1/21/2022 11:19 AM, David Gilbert wrote:
> > Thankfully for any of us that actually consider ham radio to be a
> > technical hobby instead of just a wireless chat room, not everyone here
> > shares your perspective.
>
> YES!  Much of the ARRL Handbook is tutorial material. Indeed, I'd wager
> that most if not all of the teams that have put us in space first
> learned electronics and radio from the Handbook.
>
> And most of what I post online is aimed at helping folks learn. The
> disappointing thing is when I do that, questioners seem to post new
> questions suggesting they didn't bother to study either what I (or
> others) had written on the reflector, or what I'd posted links to on my
> website, some of which I'd spent weeks or months learning and writing
> about.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>