If I didn't use the 80m squares and the 160 square as a primary rx
antennas, I'd hardly hear anything. Most of the fancy specialized rx
antennas just don't capture enough signal to be of much use - not up here
in signal starved Western Canada. Too far inland and too far north!
Occasionally (but rarely on dx) one of the beverages proves useful s/n
enhancement.
73
Don
VE6JY
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Are people really using 4 squares as their primary receiving antennas on
> 160
> - 40? I am surprised if so. 4 squares on the low bands should be all
> about
> steerable gain in my opinion. Heck I even use my beverages on 40M half the
> time and I have a 3 el beam. On 80M I have a 2 el wire beam and use the
> beverages to receive about 80% of the time. The exception being an
> EXTREMELY quiet winter evening. On 160, I have a 2 el phased array to
> Europe that is about 1.5 db less than a 4 square and I have NEVER used it
> to
> receive.
>
>
>
> Ed N1UR
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|