To: | Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>, <TowerTalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] K6STI Receiving loop question |
From: | Joe - WDØM <WD0M@centurytel.net> |
Date: | Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:16:12 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Good point - how close is "close enough" - but if you're doing it the first
time, why not 'do it right" instead of having to do it over? :-) 73, Joe WDØM At 01:11 PM 11/18/2004, Pete Smith wrote: On the other hand, if it is a receiving antenna, do you care? The additional loss in the feedline due to SWR *may* be trivial in this application. _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] K6STI Receiving loop question, Pete Smith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] K6STI Receiving loop question, Pete Smith |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] K6STI Receiving loop question, Pete Smith |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] K6STI Receiving loop question, Pete Smith |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |