To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant |
From: | Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net> |
Date: | Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:37:50 -0600 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
The Army paper referenced was published in 1991. The devices being
implanted now are of significantly newer design and likely better and
surely different in RFI/EMI rejection.
Medtronic issued a "Standard Letter" referencing arc welding. It is Rev B. 28-Feb-2008 and is two pages in length. Subject is arc welding. Anyone interested in the topic should request a copy. They can fax it. There are more lengthy Medtronic publications that I have seen and have a copy of a couple of them "somewhere" that elude me at present. They include frequency bands and field strength limits that the ICD will work normally while exposed. I think I recall at 60 Hz the upper safe level is 5000 volts per meter. I don't have a photographic memory, unfortunately, so I can't tell the rest of the freqs vs field strengths. Patrick NJ5G On 2/26/2016 7:26 AM, Big Don wrote: The results ot 1991 US Army testing of pacemakers in *EMP*,, are discussed in http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a242990.pdf At that time, the latest ones were OK, the old ones had problems.... 73 Don N7EF On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Earl Morse <kz8e@wtd.net> wrote:I remember watching Medtronic testing their pacemakers at a lab we used to use in MN back in the day. I remember thinking that they were testing at ridiculously high levels at the time. The pacemakers are small and relatively immune to RF. On Medtronics webpage I couldn't find what levels they test to but would guess that they are around 100 V/m. http://www.medtronic.com/patient-services/cardiac-emc-guide/communications-office-equipment/index.htm Medtronics doesn't really seem to worry unless you get within a couple feet of the antenna. Distance will vary with power and gain of the antenna but their rules of thumb seem to support that they are relatively immune. They don't break it out by frequency but by power and distance 12" = 3-15 watts, 24" for 15-30 watts. So your handheld has a better chance of causing you distress than your home HF station just due to proximity. YMMV, so if you feel funny stop transmitting. Earl N8SS _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Source for R45, dw |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Source for (4) 265 foot towers., Patrick Greenlee |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant, Big Don |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Source for (4) 265 foot towers., john nistico |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |