Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Installtion Question

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Installtion Question
From: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:53:03 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 1/16/15 9:15 AM, Big Don wrote:
Typical antenna survival ratings are way less - 402CD, 80mph -- 34XA,
100mph. Even if the tower is good for 130mph, the real hazard could well be
the shrapnel from disintegrating antennas blowing around the neighborhood.
That stuff blows all over while towers fall generally in one piece close to
home. Apparently, the planning folks don't worry about that.


One would not want to wander down to the counter at the city and ask this question<grin>

I assume it gets handled as the tower is a "structure" and the antenna is something "on the structure". It's like an inflatable santa claus on your roof.

From a safety standpoint, if *I* were a county engineer reviewing applications, and we had agreed that "stuff" should withstand *X* miles per hour, then I would ask that you list the antenna on your application.

And if you said "I'm putting up a tower with a 2 meter vertical on top" and then later on you install a copy of W5UN's "mighty big array" to do some moonbounce, I think you'll get in trouble.


There might be a "de minimus" exception for small things with low mass and hazard. (kind of like for free balloons.. FAA regs say that if it's smaller than a certain size and weight, you don't need to do some stuff)


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>