But then again, using bury-flex as an example, has 9.5 awg center conductor, or
.1079, or less than the N connector
73 de KG2V
> On Jun 26, 2018, at 8:32 AM, jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> On 6/25/18 10:35 PM, Avery Davis wrote:
>> Charlie,
>> Would you please share a link to a source that discusses the limits of N
>> connectors? Everything I have seen so far suggests they have as good or
>> better power handling at low frequencies than the PL-259, and are much
>> better at UHF as they are constant impedance (lower loss, higher power,
>> lower SWR). For example, Amphenol rates their SO-239 at 500 V, while
>> their Type N is rated at 1500 Volts. That sounds like better power
>> handling, to me. The current rating wasn't listed, but I would think
>> that they would be about the same as the wire gauge in the coax cable
>> center conductor, since both connectors have center contact outer
>> diameter about the same as RG-8 or RG-213 coax, especially if skin-depth
>> effects are taken into account.
>> I would appreciate a link to a better source of information on this.
>> 73,
>> Avery, WB4RTP
>
>
> The UHF connector has a larger diameter center pin (0.156") than the N
> (0.1197"), so its current handling capability is (slightly) higher.
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|