Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 66, Issue 4

To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 66, Issue 4
From: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:37:09 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
If you are talking about lightning damage the screen room will not help if 
you have a direct hit or very near one.
With a direct hit on antenna or screen  room most likely the screen wire 
will simply vaporize. If you have a very near hit
the current thru the screen wire will produce enough voltage drop for EMF 
to enter into the cage.

73
Bill wa4lav
At 10:11 PM 6/1/2008 -0400, you wrote:

>Just a cautionary note here.  Somehow I assumed you were talking about
>ambient RF shielding, but if you are talking about lightning protection,
>my guess is that the greatest jeopardy from a strike comes from
>conducted energy via coax and control lines rather than radiated
>energy.  It is really difficult to bypass those lines to ground (and
>still have them function) to the same degree that you can shield for
>radiation.  A hard short to the cage at the entry point would
>theoretically work, of course.
>
>73,
>Dave   AB7E
>
>
>
>warrenwolff@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > This subject of a Faraday?Shielded Room came up when I was
> > trying to get this new house as protected as possible.? The almighty
> > dollar interfered with some of my thoughts, this being one of them.

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 66, Issue 4, Bill Fuqua <=