| To: | Mark Spencer <mspencer12345@yahoo.ca> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Shack ground |
| From: | jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net> |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:43:18 -0700 |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Mark Spencer wrote: > I concur, personally I'm satisfied with a continous piece where possible (ie. > one piece of wire is run thru the various lugs as opposed to being spliced) > of number 3 copper wire run outside the house. When I see ham shacks with > separate low impedance RF grounds I can't help but think about what might > happen if there was a serious ground fault and the only bond between the home > electrical system ground and the low impedance RF ground was via a ground > wire in a piece of 14/2 romex that ran thru the house to the electrical > outlet that powers the ham gear. > > Yep.. Mechanically secure, continuously connected.. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] SPG is a terrible term, jimlux |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] SPG or whatever it is called now, to coax entrance ground question, jimlux |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Shack ground, Mark Spencer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Shack ground, Roger (K8RI) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |