Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material

To: "'Robert Harmon'" <k6uj@pacbell.net>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material
From: "Wes Attaway \(N5WA\)" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:24:25 -0600
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Agreed.  Jim made a perfectly reasonable response.

   -------------------
Wes Attaway (N5WA)
(318) 393-3289 - Shreveport, LA
Computer/Cellphone Forensics
AttawayForensics.com
   -------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Robert Harmon
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 5:42 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material

Roger,

That was the most juvenile retort I have ever seen on the reflector.   

Bob
K6UJ




> On Nov 4, 2019, at 1:52 PM, Roger Parsons via TowerTalk
<towertalk@contesting.com> wrote:
> 
> Perhaps you do 'suspect that Steve did'. But you can't possibly know, and
your comments were indeed disparaging.
> 
> I presume that 'virtually all of your earlier recommendations' are also
WRONG!
> 
> How does that feel?
> 
> That was a rhetorical question. Please don't answer.
> 
> 73 Roger
> VE3ZI
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>