Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Beverage feeding

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Beverage feeding
From: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:20:01 -0500
> In light of the horrible QRM in last weekends 160 test I got to
> thinking about a beverage again.  I had one here before but
> didn't use any un-un's or anything like that to feed it.  I just
> used a small antenna tuner I made, fed a bit of RF into the
> beverage and tuned it for 1:1.  What would the difference be
> between using a matching transformer or just building a small
> tuner to tune the beverage.  Why do we have to build something as
> complicated as a matching transformer instead of a tuner? 

Matching transformers are much more simple than tuners, 
broadbanded, and can also isolate the feedline from the antenna 
preventing the feedline from being part of the antenna system.

I use a small #73 mix binocular core available from Ameritron (P/N 
412-5250). This core requires a two turn primary and 5 turn 
secondary to match 75 ohms to the Beverage, or a six turn 
secondary to match 50 ohm cables to the Beverage...and as a 
transformer will work from a few hundred kHz to over 30 MHz.

I keep the ground for the Beverage TOTALLY isolated from the 
coaxial cable. If the shield is connected to the Beverage's ground, 
and since that ground is often far from perfect, the shield of the 
cable will be part of the antenna system and conduct noise and 
unwanted signals into the system. All good beverage transformers 
isolate the feedline from the antenna system.

Your tuner has the advantage of attenuating out-of-band signals, 
but that is the only advantage.


73, Tom
(W8JI@akorn.net) 

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>