| To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] separation between 40m rotary dipole and 3 element beam |
| From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Mar 2022 15:40:08 -0700 |
| List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
On 3/18/2022 1:36 PM, Jamie WW3S wrote: What would be an acceptable separation between a 40m rotary dipole and a 3 element beam? The same stub carefully placed as described in this link in the 40M feedline to suppress the second harmonic of 40M will also kill interaction of that 40M dipole with 20M. The first link is text, the second is the slide deck for talks I've done on the technique. http://k9yc.com/LocatingStubs.pdf http://k9yc.com/StubPlacement.pdf 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] separation between 40m rotary dipole and 3 element beam, Ron WV4P |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] 75 ohm version of the Budwig HQ-1 Dipole dipole adapter, Martin Flynn |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] separation between 40m rotary dipole and 3 element beam, N1BUG |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] separation between 40m rotary dipole and 3 element beam, J. Hunt via TowerTalk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |