T A RUSSELL wrote:
>
> 6.) If worse comes to worse and I have to live with a 35 ft tower, how
> disappointed will I be? Will a tribander at 35 ft perform
> (considerably) better than an inverted Vee at about that same height?
> In other words, is a short tower better than none at all?
>
> What other advice do you have that will help my tower building
> experience be successful?
>
> Thanks to all for your help,
>
> -Marty KI0LO
> martyt@pobox.com
Hi Marty. I've never had a tower or mast over 40 feet here. Usually
about 35 feet. I've worked 297 countries so far, and most of those were
with a Cushcraft A-3. You won't be disappointed. It's a heck of a lot
better than dipoles. 73
Tom W7WHY
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|