I guess what I meant to say is for the concrete base, I could pour one the
size required for 45, I understood that it was like 25, But thank you for
the reply in being sure I was not being stupid.
I had thought a base for 45 and windloading of 25 should be a safe bet for it.
But it is nice to know that you were looking out for me.
Mike...ND6A
At 06:11 AM 10/25/99 -0600, you wrote:
>
>On Sun, 24 Oct 1999 "Mike Nash, ND6A" <nd6a@arrl.net> writes:
>>
>> Thanks to all that replied, regarding this stuff, still would like
>> to find some kind of specs. (for Rohn 35)
>
>>But I guess I can always just use 45 specs and be safe.
>>
> WRONG !
>
>Please re-read my post to you Mike.
>
>Remember that the leg gauge is EXACTLY the same as Rohn 25
>and therefore has the SAME Maximum Vertical Load capacity as
>Rohn 25 ( NOT 45 ). It is my understanding that the ultimate
>tower load capacity is determined by the maximum load that
>can be supported by the bottom section.
>
>The larger face width makes the tower more rigid and therefore it
>should tolerate the twisting from side mounted antennas better
>than Rohn 25 but the total wind load is still the same as R25.
>
>I have seen used Rohn 35 sell for anything from $30 to $75
>per section, depending on condition and age.
>
>de Tom N4KG
>
>___________________________________________________________________
>Get the Internet just the way you want it.
>Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
>Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.
>
>
Please note the new e-mail address...nd6a@arrl.net
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|