To: | "Scott McClements" <kc2pih@gmail.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Front-to-back / Front-to-rear |
From: | "David J Windisch" <davidjw@cinci.rr.com> |
Date: | Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:15:13 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Depends on what the goal is, eg, F/B never cracked a pileup. 73 Dave N3HE ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott McClements" <kc2pih@gmail.com> To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 8:59 PM Subject: [TowerTalk] Front-to-back / Front-to-rear > Hi, > > Since I am in the process of designing a new directional antenna > (w/NEC2), I have started to think about which measure(s) of rearward > rejection I would maximize on: > _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Digital Angle Gauge, David J Windisch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Front-to-back / Front-to-rear, K4SAV |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Front-to-back / Front-to-rear, Jim Lux |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Front-to-back / Front-to-rear, K4SAV |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |