That's exactly what W3LPL has on 80/160.
You might email Frank and ask about it.
73
Don
N8DE
Quoting David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>:
My experience with 40m inside 80m says it is a bad idea.
David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://wiki.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://k1ttt.net:7373
-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of N5KM
- Kris
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 19:24
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Nested 4-Squares
Is nesting 4-Square arrays a good idea? By that I mean, for instance, an 80m
4-square inside a 160m 4-square. I was about to model this but it occurs to
me that someone has probably already done this exercise.
Good idea or bad idea?
Kris N5KM
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|