To: | "TOWERTALK@contesting.com" <TOWERTALK@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160? |
From: | "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Date: | Mon, 04 May 2009 14:44:32 -0700 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
On Mon, 4 May 2009 17:31:05 -0400, john@kk9a.com wrote: > it worked great, even with >a much less than perfect ground system. Yes. And, of course, making the antenna longer increases its radiation resistance, which in turn reduces the losses in the radial system. A good radial system still helps, but it is a few dB less important. 73, Jim Brown K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160?, Rick Karlquist |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Amphenol PL259, Jorge Diez - CX6VM |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160?, Rick Karlquist |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160?, Al Williams |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |