Rick,
How high off the ground was the bottom of the bottom half of the vertical
dipole?
73..de John/K4WJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
To: <k0rc@citlink.net>
Cc: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2011 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 100, Issue 63
> Robert Chudek - K0RC wrote:
>> Jim Brown, K9YC wrote: "BUT - in my experience, vertical dipoles don't
>> work very well on the HF bands."
>>
>
> It is difficult to feed a vertical dipole in the traditional
> way in the center without the feedline affecting the pattern.
> It is also tricky to feed it from the bottom, as a half wave
> vertical. I did some direct A/B tests comparing a 1/4 wave
> vertical to a 1/2 wave vertical on 20 meters. They were
> virtually indisinguishable, with maybe a slight edge going
> to the 1/2 wave vertical. You can call that a vertical dipole
> if you want. It had no radials by the way, while the 1/4 wave
> vertical had 32 1/4 wave radials. YMMV.
>
> Rick N6RK
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|