The price of a full size 40m element is considerably more. Not only do you
need more aluminum and a stronger center piece, you also need a stronger
tower and rotator. I have had full size 40m beams and they are great. You
will get better bandwidth and higher efficiency. If you do wish to shorten
it, split the element and use a Hi-Q coil or some type of linear loading.
As far as designing and building one that requires no adjustment, I think
that will be a challenge, especially of you load it. I model all of my yagis
and have always needed to make an adjustment to the DE.
John KK9A
To:towertalk@contesting.com
Subject:[TowerTalk] 40 meter rotating dipole question
From:"Mark, K5ER" <k5er@arrl.net>
Date:Tue, 01 Oct 2013 14:24:58 -0500
Hi Guys, I have checked the archives, but not found specific answers, so
forgive me if this has already been covered and I am asking the wrong
questions. To help a friend, I am building a 40 meter rotatable dipole, to
live at 90' on his mast. It will be about 12' above his 36' boom 20M OWA. I
will fabricate a heavy duty mount/center insulator, and incorporate 2 truss
cables, either dacron or kevlar. He delivered to me two (used) elements from
a previous unidentified antenna. Each element is abt 28' long, with the
taper schedule going from 1 1/4 down to 5/8. I have spare material in stock,
so I could easily add a 1/2" x 5' tip to each and end up with a full size
dipole.
Question one - The price of material isn't much more, so why does it seem
that "nobody" builds rotatable dipoles to the full 66-67 feet?
Question two - IF a shortened antenna is better, is there a "better" length?
I see many in the range from 38 to 55 feet.
Question three - If shortened, I know the ant will be capacitive, and
therefore can be matched by adding an inductor across the feed. I find many
pages of formula with lots of Latin characters, but missed that day in math
class. If someone had a hint of a starting point, ie> 4" long, 5 turns on 2"
diam. , or 4 turns on 3" diam, etc. I could then work backwards and make
this work for him.
I have EZnec 5+, but have only used it to build OWA antenna so far, which
makes a beautiful direct feed, so I have no experience with adding a load. I
plan to input the taper schedule into EZnec, but if a given length is known
to be superior, I am not too proud to ask for it, rather than spend hours
building model after model working my way through the possibilities.
I understand that height can affect performance and feed point impedance,
however, neither the owner nor I climb. I need to model and build this
antenna, and then expect it to work as modeled when the climber puts it in
place, so any ideas would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Mark, K5ER
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|