brunet@us.ibm.com writes:
>
>
> Are their designs for 80m dipoles covering 3.5 through 4.0 preferably without
> a
> trip to the antenna? Sounds like the search for the holy grail. Some ideas:
I like this idea by W6NL.
http://www.contesting.com/_towertalk/9711/0701.html
Also see these:
http://www.cebik.com/wb.html
http://www.contesting.com/_towertalk/9711/0712.html
--
George Fremin III "I'm talkin' 'bout that outlaw X
Johnson City, TX It's cuttin' through the air.... "
K5TR (ex.WB5VZL)
830/868-2510 -- "Heard it on the X"
geoiii@kkn.net -- ZZ Top
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|