Al,
I built one of these several years ago and considering that it is a very
short, much comprimised antenna, it worked extremely well. I made 250 plus
Q's during the CQ 160
contest in 96. This was with only 5 watts!!! Also had something like 6
countries too.
No way it can compete with a full size antenna but it is fun to play with. I
did not tie the shield to the bottom of the tower and my antenna was only
about 8 feet off the ground at the far end. The nice thing was that the
thing was very broadbanded and did not have to tune a thing.
Again...it's a compromise but on a very small city lot in WV, it's ok.
73,
Tom K5IID
>From: ATanner283 <ATanner283@aol.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
>Date: Thu, 25 Dec 1997 18:16:24 EST
>To: Towertalk@contesting.com
>Subject: [TowerTalk] Linear Loaded Sloper
>Organization: AOL (http://www.aol.com)
>Sender: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
>X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C
>X-Status:
>
> I am going to put up a linear loaded sloper for 160. I have two questions:
>1.does the coax have to be grounded to the tower at the bottom as well as the
>top as shown in the handbook, and why???? 2. Is the tuning of the systen done
>by lenghtening/shortening of the open wire line at the tower end, and does the
>sloper length have be adjusted at the same time.(I guess thats REALLY more
>than two). Thanks for all the good info on the 160 ants. I'm going to try this
>first. 73 Al W8FAX
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
>Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
>
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
|