To: | "John Becker" <johnb3030@comcast.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] When is a 100' tower only 97' tall? |
From: | "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com> |
Reply-to: | richard@karlquist.com |
Date: | Wed, 8 Aug 2012 11:43:35 -0700 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
John Becker wrote: > I was looking at the engineering drawing for Rohn 25G yesterday, and was > surprised to see that the total length of a section is 10' 0". This > *includes* the 3.5" that is inserted into the next section. The > 73, John, K9MM Coincidentally a few weeks ago I measured some "8 foot" Heights sections. As with Rohn, they basically have a "gross" height of 8 feet, but actually that even varied slightly from section to section. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] When is a 100' tower only 97' tall?, Dan Schaaf |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Fwd: When is a 100' tower only 97' tall?, Hans Hammarquist |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Cold galvanizing paint, Tom Anderson |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Fwd: When is a 100' tower only 97' tall?, Hans Hammarquist |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |