To: | Alan NV8A <nv8a@att.net>,towertalk reflector <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Towers and property values |
From: | ersmar@comcast.net |
Date: | Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:39:49 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Alan et al: I posted the following a few months after I erected my tower in my backyard: http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00621.html . Was my increaased assessment due to the presence of the tower? Coincidence? You be the judge. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Alan NV8A <nv8a@att.net> > It just occurred to me to look at this issue differently. > > I have read that one reason municipalities demand building permits is > that they can up the value of a property based on the improvements and > then collect more property tax. > > Are there cases where people have been granted a permit for a tower on a > residential property and had the value raised as a result? > > (Neither of these applies here: (a) Michigan property values can be > raised by more than the CPI only when the property changes hands; (b) in > this municipality -- and many surrounding ones -- permits are not > required for towers and antennas used by FCC-licensed amateurs.) > > 73 > > Alan NV8A > _______________________________________________ > > > > _______________________________________________ > TowerTalk mailing list > TowerTalk@contesting.com > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] towers and taxes, ny6dx |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] coax seal, Steve Maki |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Towers and property values, William Q Meeker |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated, w3qx |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |