Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] FW: Change in SWR

To: "'reflector -tower'" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] FW: Change in SWR
From: "Matt" <km5vi@flukey.cc>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:44:24 -0600
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Well put Earl!

-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Earl
Morse
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 9:20 AM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR

>>On 12/3/2013 7:51 PM, Drax Felton wrote:
>> On Tower Talk no antenna is ever sufficiently patterned, no tower 
>>base ever  deep enough, nor wide enough, nor is cable greasy enough, 
>>nor is any guy  anchored stoutly enough.  Such is its nature.
>
>That's because some of us are engineers and scientists by training and 
>experience.
>
>73, Jim K9YC

It is easy science and engineering to make the tower base infinitely large,
the cable permanently greasy, the ground plane perfectly conductive, and the
guy anchors infinitely stout.  The real work comes in deciding how much
large, greasy, conductive, and stout you can get for a buck and stay within
the desired safety and performance parameters.

There lies the real rub.

73,
Earl
N8SS


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3658/6891 - Release Date: 12/04/13

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>