Rather than a relay, how about 80M traps that connects the feedpoints of the
wire to the coax - that would allow 80M energy to bypass the linear load.
-Rex-
Rex Lint, Consultant
26 Brek Drive
Merrimack, NH 03054
PH: 603-860-7651
-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Marc Tessier - VE3TES
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 11:32 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] 160M dipole idea for 160/80M?
Just playing around with an antenna design , I found the plans for an 80M
version of such antenna on the net recently, and was wondering if this one
might work for 160M as well, link >>>
http://home.cogeco.ca/~ve3tes/linear%20loaded%20160m%20dipole.JPG
and would it be possible to make this into a twin band dipole by adding
relays to short out the lengths of ladder line? as shown here as switches
>>>
http://home.cogeco.ca/~ve3tes/linear%20loaded%20160m%20dipole-80switch.JPG
Just looking for some input, after running the CW test on the weekend from
my 80M dipole I figured this band could be some real fun, so time to start
thinking of a more efficient antenna for 160...
Regards,
Marc Tessier - VE3TES
ve3tes@cogeco.ca
http://home.cogeco.ca/~ve3tes/
http://www.eQSL.cc/Member.cfm?VE3TES
http://www.qrz.com/ve3tes
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.15/1837 - Release Date: 12/8/2008
9:38 AM
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|
