>VE6JY: In my opinion, that low antenna won't add much in a stack
As Don is a big time contester up north of me, his opinion is
like gold.
>W9RE: I think you are kidding yourself if you think that will
> make much difference
Another vote against.
>W2UP: In your case, I don't think that low antenna will do you
> much good because:
>1. I'm on the east coast and your not. You need lower angles.
>2. The "lower is best" scenario is fading away with the sunspots
Another vote against. East coast guys can work runs into Europe,
and we don't (read I) even hear them :-(
>N4KG: I'd stay with 2 antennas on a 72 ft tower
Another vote against.
Am I seeing a pattern here?
As I was just day dreaming about the stack, and don't have
the second antenna, never mind the third. I think I will just
go back to my original thought about my 5 elem 10 meter
beam at 48 feet, and leave the stack for the next peak.
Thanks all for your help.
Peter
VE6YC
|