To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] The Value of HFTA |
From: | "Edward Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:23:04 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Those that are firm believers in modeling should understand the purpose and limitations of their modeling software. "Antenna Modeling software" is used to design an antenna above a modeled ground plane below - or in free space as desired. HFTA takes an assumed radiator and models the effect of that radiator on a complex terrain defining the "net ground plane". You don't use HFTA to design an antenna and you don't use a great program like EZNEC to answer a height question above complex terrain. One thing that HFTA does NOT do well is answer the question about stacking from a "max gain" perspective. EZNEC will tell you the best design for stacking yagis for max gain in a direction however HFTA will tell you what the right height for those yagis are or if the stack is even the strongest signal under typical approach angles. A tool is only as good as its goal and limitations. For the right answers, use them all. 73 Ed N1UR _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Off topic quesiton, Lee Hiers |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] The Value of HFTA, Jim Brown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] The Value of HFTA, john@kk9a.com |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] The Value of HFTA, Jim Brown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |