To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: Why no CW segment? |
From: | Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com> |
Reply-to: | wrt@dslextreme.com |
Date: | Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:27:35 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
I was surprised to see a few days ago that the FCC turned down a request to "segmentize" 160 meters. I have a question: If segments are a good idea on the HF bands, why not on 160? And conversely if no segments is a good idea on 160, why do we have them on HF? I'm not trying to start a flame war - don't even think about it - I just am honestly curious why the different approach. -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Topband: Re: 1837.5 KC/1845 KC CW QRM, Iowaguy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Why no CW segment?, Tom Rauch |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: [Fwd: RE: YA8G], Herb Schoenbohm |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Why no CW segment?, Tom Rauch |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |