Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Inverted L and the High Angle Field

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: Inverted L and the High Angle Field
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:33:29 -0800
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
On 2/29/2020 9:56 AM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:
Have to disagree on the no-use-for the horizontal leg.

It fills in the doughnut hole in the high angle radiation, which in
contests is very good for keeping others from planting on your run
frequency. Also there are high angle path opportunities that are gradually
becoming more recognized.

This effect is not nearly as great as generally believed, and depends on the relative lengths of the horizontal and vertical sections. For example, consider an L with 70 ft and 70 ft sections, as compared to 100 ft vertical and 35 ft horizontal. the difference in field at 70 degrees elevation between the two antennas is 4 dB over Sandy soil, 3 dB over Very Good soil. For 50 ft vertical and 80 ft horizontal, the difference is 4 dB over very good soil as compared to 100 vertical, 35 horizontal. The reason for the difference, of course, is the current distribution between the two sections depending on their electrical length.

Comparing a T with 50 ft vertical and 55 ft horizontal to an L with 50 ft vertical and 85 ft horizontal over Very Good soil, the difference is also 4 dB.

These differences are less than an S-unit, hardly enough to prevent someone poaching a run frequency. Propagation for shorter distances corresponding to a higher wave angle are covered by ground wave on 160M.

The way ARRL and NEC plot vertical patterns can be deceiving, because they always set the peak of the pattern to full scale. To see the difference, one must plot both antennas with the same scale. In NEC, this is accomplished by modeling each antenna, displaying the vertical pattern and saving the traces, then recalling the saved trace for the other antenna and selecting the recalled trace. The cursor can then be moved along the vertical axis and will display the difference in dB between the traces.

There are many examples of this technique in
http://k9yc.com/AntennaPlanning.pdf

A shorter vertical sections reduces the radiation resistance, which increases losses in the counterpoise/radial system, which in turn strongly depend upon soil quality.

73, Jim K9YC
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>