Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 160M JT65HF

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: 160M JT65HF
From: Darl DEEDS <na8w@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:15:29 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I was under the impression that JT65 was a weak signal mode. 600 watts seems 
a lot for that. Is that a normal power level for that? I was hoping to work 
it without an amplifier.

Darl  NA8W

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 2:00 PM
To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: 160M JT65HF

> On 12/30/2011 9:14 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>> Most JT65 activity is relatively low power - typically between 10 and
>> 50 watts on HF.
>
> I fired up on 1838 last night running 600W to my usual Tee vertical. In
> about two hours, I worked about 15 guys in 10 states, including XE1, VT
> and NC, all of whom were running less than 30 watts. I left the JT65HF
> software running all night, and when I came into the shack this morning
> saw activity from at least a dozen stations.
>
> Another point -- while I was making those Qs, there were often at least
> two other QSOs going on simultaneously, mostly with somewhat different
> frequency offsets -- plus or minus as much as 500 Hz.  The JT65 software
> protocol and decoder are quite good at looking only for the desired
> signal, and JT65HF software can decode several signals at the same time.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
> 
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>