There is a BIG difference (Legally) between reverse Engineering for personal
use, and publishing the results.
Bill--W4BSG
----- Original Message -----
From: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
To: <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Cc: <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: 2 Parallel Beverages
> Has DXE actually made that claim publicly?
> I fail to see how they can stop anyone from reverse engineering for
> personal
> use.
>
> I doubt they could even spell Customer Relations from reports Ive heard.
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Herb Schoenbohm" <herbs@vitelcom.net>
> To: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
> Cc: <topband@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 8:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Topband: 2 Parallel Beverages
>
>
>> On 5/23/2012 6:51 PM, ZR wrote:
>>> Is this box sealed in epoxy? Why hasnt someone reverse engineered it and
>>> published the schematic?
>>> If anyone has a bad one send it to me; the least I can do is look at it
>>> with a VNA or a GR bridge.
>>>
>>> Carl
>>> KM1H
>>>
>>>
>> The box is cast aluminum and relatively easy to take apart. However DXE
>> appears not to wish a schematic publish nor do I want to do battle with
>> their attorneys as others have. I would just like to talk to someone in
>> their customer relations department. I have the box working but without
>> their support.
>>
>>
>>
>> Herb, KV4FZ
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2425/5018 - Release Date: 05/23/12
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
|