Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: AM interference on 1840

To: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: AM interference on 1840
From: Gary - K7EK via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Gary - K7EK <gary.k7ek@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 17:06:15 -0400
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Bandplans are not the same in every country so moving to suit one will cause 
disruption for others. It's been proven time and time again that it is best to 
let the masses figure it out, based upon their individual needs. Dictating a 
frequency for one group will most like be unsatisfactory for others. My two  
cents..

Best regards,

Gary, K7EK

Radcliff, KY (EM77at)

⁣Sent from BlueMail ​

On May 21, 2019, 11:00, at 11:00, Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com> wrote:
>As most FT8 folks (like slaves) follow the K1JT 
>suggested frequencies per band their radio will 
>automatically QSY to the preprogrammed frequency. 
>Some even think that they can't QSY and are 
>demanding the software developer to add other frequencies to the
>software...
>
>OMG.
>
>73
>Peter SM2CEW
>
>
>
>At 13:50 2019-05-21, cqtestk4xs--- via Topband wrote:
>>I don't have a dog in the fight but why not move 
>>to 1843 or 1844.  Is 1840 sacrosanct? Bill KH7XS
>
>
>_________________
>Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
>Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>