Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Low frequency RX antenna

To: wb6rse1@mac.com, Steve Lawrence via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Low frequency RX antenna
From: Gene Smar via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Gene Smar <ersmar@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 20:51:04 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I agree with Steve - use whatever fits your property. Before I erected my tower 
in 2001, I had space in my suburban back yard for 3 bidirectional EWE rx 
antennas.  (See WA2WVL's Feb 95 QST article and his later one on bidirectional 
designs.) I was surprised at how well the S/N improved; I did use an ARR preamp 
in the line to the rx, with DC power to the feedpoint relays via the coax 
feedlines. And I had several hundred feet of RG-59 buried in that small 
backyard.
73 de Gene Smar AD3F 

Sent from my Radio Shack TRS-80 model 100 laptop 
 
  On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 12:15 PM, Steve Lawrence via 
Topband<topband@contesting.com> wrote:   If you're considering a low band loop 
RX antenna you should just try anything that your space and circumstances allow.

All loops are just a variation on a theme subject to interactions you likely 
have limited ability to control. The same antenna may be amazing one day and a 
dud the next. Phased loops are yet another variation.

This article on ground independent loops may prove of interest:
E. Cunningham, K6SE (SK), “Flag, Pennants and Other Ground-Independent Low-Band 
Receiving Antennas,” QST, Jul 2000, p 34. 

GL & 73 - Steve WB6RSE
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
  
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>