Receive antennas are all about S/N ratio not signal strength. They will be
significantly down but should be much quieter.
Cecil
K5DL
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 30, 2020, at 1:57 PM, Mark Lunday <wd4elg@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> "Beverages just want to work" is what I have heard.
>
> Not having much luck with that here. I suspect operator/installation error.
>
> I did a lot of reading and I must be doing something wrong.
>
>
>
> * 250 feet of insulated wire strung out in 030 degrees direction toward
> EU, pretty straight, varying in height from 4 to 6 feet, running through
> thick brush with no metal objects or artificial elements along the run.
> * 9:1 transformer at feed point with ground rod
> * 300 feet of coax, mix of RG-8, MMR-400 to get to the edge of the woods
> from the house
> * No terminating resistor
>
> On bands 160-40, the signals are very weak. I am monitoring WSPR, FT8. I
> can hear signals on 160-40 but they are way down compared to dipoles and
> inverted L on the same bands. Like 20-30 db down. From what I read, I should
> NOT need an HF pre-amplifier, right?
>
> Signals on 30 and 20 seem to be better and I can copy some DX from EU on FT8.
>
> I will try installing a new ground rod, the old one is 10 years old and
> perhaps not making a good ground connection at the feedpoint. The
> transformer is brand new, so that's not an issue. The coax has tested out
> fine. Soil is central North Carolina clay, a bit dry at this time.
>
> I am guessing performance is poor on 160-40 because of the short length and
> that it's bi-directional (no terminating resistor), which I am seeing on 30
> meters. But I did not think it would be THIS bad on 160-40....
>
> Mark Lunday, WD4ELG
> Greensboro, NC FM06be
> wd4elg@arrl.net<mailto:wd4elg@arrl.net>
> http://wd4elg.blogspot.com
> SKCC #16439 FISTS #17972 QRP ARCI #16497
>
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|